We have seven different risk registers and none of them agree with each other.

This isn't just an inconvenience.

It's a critical security vulnerability hiding in plain sight.

Your CSPM calls it critical 🟥 

Your risk register says medium 🟧

Your compliance tool doesn't track it at all 🧠

Your board dashboard shows everything's green 🟩

Enterprise security teams are drowning in contradictory data:

• Three different vulnerability scanners with conflicting results

• Risk assessments that never match security findings

• Compliance dashboards disconnected from actual control effectiveness

• Executive reports based on whatever data was easiest to collect

When major decisions are made using incomplete or contradictory information, you're not managing risk – you're gambling with it.

The solution isn't another tool. It's a central data layer that unifies your existing GRC ecosystem.

Why It Matters 🔍

The why: the core problem this solves and why you should care

This data fragmentation issue is actively undermining your security posture.

When your security reality is split across dozens of disconnected systems, your ability to identify, prioritise, and address threats collapses. Critical vulnerabilities disappear into the gaps between systems.

Remediation efforts get duplicated or, worse, overlooked entirely.

Your GRC team spends 70% (!!!) of their time manually reconciling data from different sources rather than actually managing risk. Your most experienced analysts become glorified data entry specialists, copying findings from one system to another while trying to maintain a semblance of consistency.

Meanwhile, leadership makes multi-million dollar security decisions based on whatever snapshot happens to be available during the quarterly review.

When asked uncomfortable questions by the board or security leadership, the team scrambles to assemble a coherent story from contradictory systems.

A central data layer changes this dynamic completely.

By creating a unified data layer that spans across your environment, you transform random noise into actionable insights.

You stop debating which system is "right" and start making decisions based on a complete picture of your security reality – without replacing the specialised tools your teams rely on.

Strategic Framework 🧩

The what: The conceptual approach broken down into 3 main principles

Standardised Taxonomy Across Systems

The foundation of your central data layer is a standardised taxonomy that creates a common language across all your GRC systems.

This taxonomy defines core entities (risks, controls, assets, threats), their relationships, standard attributes, and consistent metrics. This allows different systems to speak to each other by providing a common translation layer.

When implemented correctly, a "critical risk" means the same thing whether it originates in your CSPM tool, your risk register, or your vendor assessment program.

System-Agnostic Data Architecture

Your central data layer must be system-agnostic – it exists independently from any specific GRC tool or platform.

This independence is crucial because it:

• Breaks vendor lock-in for your data

• Allows specialised tools to focus on what they do best

• Enables gradual improvements rather than costly lifts-and-shifts

• Creates resilience against tool changes and vendor M&As

The architecture should separate data storage from data processing and data presentation, enabling you to evolve each layer independently.

Progressive Data Integration

Building a central data layer doesn't happen overnight. The most successful implementations follow a progressive integration approach that delivers value at each stage.

Start with critical data domains that cause the most pain (often risk data or vulnerability management), then expand systematically.

Each integration point should solve a specific business problem rather than pursuing "integration for integration's sake."

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH (MAYBE YOU?)

Interested in partnering with the GRC Engineer?

Your product, your brand, your collaterals, shared with a highly relevant audience of hundreds of GRC/security leaders and experienced practitioners managing programs at the world’s biggest tech companies. 

Reach out now to be featured in front of pre-qualified potential customers with World-Class open-rate and CTR, more info available here.

Want to work together, this is where it happens ⬇️

Execution Blueprint 🛠️

The how: 3 practical steps to put this strategy into action at your organisation

Map Your Data Landscape

Start by documenting your current GRC data ecosystem – not just the tools, but the actual data elements that matter to your program.

Create an inventory that captures:

• Primary GRC data sources (platforms, tools, spreadsheets)

• Key data entities in each system (risks, controls, assets, etc.)

• Main attributes for each entity (severity, status, owner, etc.)

• How data flows between systems (both automated and manual)

Don't just focus on sanctioned systems of record. Those Excel spreadsheets that "fill the gaps" between platforms are often a critical part of your data landscape.

This mapping exercise often reveals surprising insights.

You’ll see.

Establish Your Core Data Model

You now understand your current landscape, the next step is defining your core data model – the structure that will form the foundation of your data layer.

Start with the critical data domains, typically:

• Risk data (categories, scoring methodology, relationships)

• Control definitions (with cross-framework mappings)

• Asset inventory (with business context and classifications)

• Vulnerability and finding data (normalised across security tools)

For each domain, define standard entity definitions, required attributes, relationships to other entities, and normalisation rules.

Like you would when building a standard relational database.

The crucial difference between this data model and your existing tool-specific models is its independence from any particular platform.

This model must serve as a system-agnostic reference point that can accommodate data from any of your current or future tools.

When defining your model, resist the urge to capture everything. Focus on what truly matter for decision-making right now.

Implement Your Data Integration Hub

With your data landscape mapped and your core model defined, you can implement the actual integration hub that will serve as your central data layer.

This typically involves:

1. Selecting an integration approach – options include purpose-built GRC data integration platforms, enterprise data lakes with GRC-specific schemas, or API management platforms with custom integration logic.

2. Building connectors to priority systems – start with the systems that contain your most critical risk data or cause the most pain in current processes.

3. Implementing data quality controls – establish processes to validate data against your core model and maintain data lineage.

4. Creating unified views for key stakeholders – develop reports that present a comprehensive view across previously siloed data.

Work on this step-by-step, don’t try to boil the ocean.

Every win is getting you miles ahead of any other GRC program out there.

Each integration point should solve a specific business problem and demonstrate clear value before you expand.

Remember: Your central data layer isn't just a technical solution – it's a strategic asset that transforms how your organisation understands and manages risk.

Content Queue 📖

The learn: This week's resource to dive deeper on the topic

In this great conversation with Simon Goldsmith, Head of Information Security at OVO Energy, we discussed the importance of systems thinking and how it relates to building your GRC program.

Very relevant to this core data model conversation!

That’s all for this week’s issue, folks!

If you enjoyed it, you might also enjoy:

• My spicier takes on LinkedIn [/in/ayoubfandi]

• Listening to the GRC Engineering Podcast 

  • Spotify

  • Youtube

  • Apple Podcasts

See you next week!